Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RUCKLE AND GUARINO, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael HANGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Edgewater Park Owners Cooperative Inc., Defendant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered May 24, 2007, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $80,000, payable from a mechanic's lien discharge bond filed by defendants Hangan and International Fidelity, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the judgment vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered December 26, 2006, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to enforce the lien, and April 17, 2007, which, to the extent appealable, denied the motion by Hangan and International Fidelity to renew the prior order, unanimously dismissed as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
To establish the right to enforce a mechanic's lien, the contractor, or in this case the subcontractor, must make a prima facie case that the lien is valid, and that it is entitled to the amount asserted in the lien (8 Warren's Weed New York Real Property § 92.11[3][a] [5th ed.], citing Cramer v. Esswein, 220 App.Div. 10, 220 N.Y.S. 634 [1927]; see LHV Precast Inc. v. Woodstock Lawn & Home Maintenance, 296 A.D.2d 736, 744 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2002] ). Plaintiff did not adduce sufficient evidence to establish prima facie entitlement to summary judgment enforcing the lien. Notably, the proposal on which plaintiff relies postdates the work performed, and plaintiff's evidence failed to establish that plaintiff is entitled to the amount asserted in the lien, i.e., $80,000.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 04, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)