Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AIRLINES REPORTING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRO TRAVEL, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 27, 1996, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss this action for plaintiff's lack of standing to sue as a real party in interest, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint reinstated.
Plaintiff is in the business of accrediting travel agents in the United States for the sale of world wide air transportation tickets and ancillary travel services. Its program is accomplished through a computerized system known as the Agent's Standard Ticket and Area Settlement Plan. Pursuant to this Plan, travel agents enter into a formal Agent Reporting Agreement whereby plaintiff, authorized under separate agreement with commercial air carriers, furnishes the agents with blank accountable standard forms to be issued as airline tickets and other travel instruments. In exchange, the agents report their sales and remit all proceeds to plaintiff on a weekly basis.
The instant action is against one such travel agency for failure to account for the sale of some $250,000 worth of tickets, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of fiduciary obligation, negligent failure to supervise employees, and fraud.
A contracting party generally has a right to maintain an action in its own name (CPLR 1004). Plaintiff was not some stranger whose only connection to these transactions was by power of attorney (cf., Spencer v. Standard Chems. and Metals Corp., 237 N.Y. 479, 143 N.E. 651). Notwithstanding its status as a clearinghouse for the airlines, plaintiff had independent authority and its own beneficial interest in this business (see, Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corp., 211 App.Div. 523, 207 N.Y.S. 493, affd. 242 N.Y. 557, 152 N.E. 425). Plaintiff's agreement with the carriers permitted such independence of operation, and defendant, by signing onto the Plan, agreed to conduct all its business with respect to those carriers exclusively through plaintiff (see, Jarach v. Ocean Carriers Corp., 9 A.D.2d 646, 191 N.Y.S.2d 407).
In short, plaintiff is a “real party in interest,” entitled to maintain this action in its own name (Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S & N Travel, 238 A.D.2d 292, 293, 656 N.Y.S.2d 299; see also, Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S & N Travel, 58 F.3d 857, 861, n. 4).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)