Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donnell HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered July 7, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, to a term of 5 1/212 to 16 1/212 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence was sufficient to establish probable cause, since the arresting officer testified that he had received a radio transmission from an undercover officer indicating a “positive buy,” and testified to the undercover officer's detailed and accurate description of the sellers and their location (see People v. Washington, 87 N.Y.2d 945, 641 N.Y.S.2d 223, 663 N.E.2d 1253). The arresting officer's testimony raised no “substantial issues relating to the validity of the arrest” (People v. Petralia, 62 N.Y.2d 47, 52, 476 N.Y.S.2d 56, 464 N.E.2d 424).
Defendant's claim that the court erred in locking the courtroom doors during the charge to the jury is unpreserved because defendant failed to raise it in a timely manner (see People v. Gilchrist, 139 A.D.2d 663, 526 N.Y.S.2d 1019). In any event, were we to review it, we would find defendant's contention to be without merit. The trial court did not act affirmatively to exclude spectators, but acted within its discretion to insure that the jury's attention was not diverted by any possible distraction during the charge (see, People v. Colon, 71 N.Y.2d 410, 526 N.Y.S.2d 932, 521 N.E.2d 1075).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)