Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Fredericka LUMLEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Manuel Exposito, etc., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 29, 1996, which denied the motion of defendants General Mills, Inc. and Lewis A. Wilmott for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Triable issues of fact remain concerning whether the driver of the vehicle that was struck in a rear-end collision was negligent in that amongst other things he was tailgating at an inappropriate rate of speed and made a sudden stop; and whether such negligence, if any, contributed to the collision (see, Malekan v. City Harvest, 234 A.D.2d 94, 651 N.Y.S.2d 295; see also, Darmento v. Pacific Molasses Co., 81 N.Y.2d 985, 599 N.Y.S.2d 528, 615 N.E.2d 1012).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)