Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DAQUAN D. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Kim D., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2003, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated the parental rights of respondent mother to Daquan D., Dominique H., Jamel C., and David H. and committed custody and guardianship of those children to petitioner for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record supports the finding that the child care agency made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][f] ). Although respondent was initially enrolled in a drug treatment and parenting skills program by her parole officer, took up residence with her sister and was visiting with her children, this state of affairs did not last and the case worker was subsequently thwarted in his attempts at rendering further assistance. The record confirms that the case worker's efforts, which included correspondence and visits to respondent's last known address, discussions with her family and scheduling case conferences, were frustrated by respondent's lack of cooperation (see Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). The court's findings of permanent neglect turned largely on credibility assessments. We ordinarily defer to such assessments and perceive no basis in the present record to except from this practice (see Matter of Shevonne S., 188 A.D.2d 528, 529, 591 N.Y.S.2d 195 [1992] ).
The dispositional determination, freeing the four children for adoption, was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). Respondent had been incarcerated for most of the children's lives and they had been in foster care either from birth or early infancy. In view of respondent's prolonged and continuing failure to take the steps necessary to her assumption of custodial parenting responsibilities, the court's disposition represents the children's best chance to grow up in a stable, nurturing familial environment.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 24, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)