Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TAALIYAH SIMONE S.D., etc., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Leon D., Respondent-Appellant, New York Foundling Hospital, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2005, which terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of abandonment was based on uncontroverted evidence that, during the six-month period immediately prior to the filing of the petition, respondent failed to visit or communicate with his children or the agency, although able to do so and not prevented or discouraged from doing so by the agency (Social Services Law § 384-b[5][a]; Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315, 600 N.Y.S.2d 37 [1993] ). The finding that termination of respondent's parental rights was in the children's best interests is supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence, including, among other things, that the foster mother who has cared for them since they were three weeks old is strongly attached to them, has been providing quality care for their special needs arising out of their developmental delays, and wants to adopt them (Matter of Starlette P., 302 A.D.2d 299, 756 N.Y.S.2d 171 [2003] ). While respondent may have demonstrated some concern for his children, that concern was shown too late, and the children should not have to wait any longer for a permanent home (Matter of Yadira W., 261 A.D.2d 346, 691 N.Y.S.2d 421 [1999] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 25, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)