PEOPLE v. BARNETT (1997)

 Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of felony driving while intoxicated, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree and criminal contempt in the first degree.   We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in ordering him, as part of the sentence, to pay restitution to the New York State Police Department.   Contrary to defendant's contention, the restitution did not reimburse the police for the normal operating costs of law enforcement that are voluntarily incurred (cf., People v. Watson, 197 A.D.2d 880, 602 N.Y.S.2d 471;  People v. Dulanski, 175 A.D.2d 672, 572 N.Y.S.2d 596);  instead, it covered the cost of repairing a police car that was damaged as a direct result of defendant's criminal conduct (see, People v. Cruz, 81 N.Y.2d 996, 998, 599 N.Y.S.2d 533, 615 N.E.2d 1017).

 The court erred, however, in determining the amount of restitution to be $8,227 without holding a hearing on that issue.   The court directed that defendant reimburse the New York State Police Department in that amount based upon an estimate of damage provided by that Department during the presentence investigation.   Defendant did not make a statement at either the plea hearing or at sentencing sufficient to support the determination of the amount of restitution (see, People v. Consalvo, 89 N.Y.2d 140, 144-145, 651 N.Y.S.2d 963, 674 N.E.2d 672).   Consequently, the court was required to hold a hearing to determine the amount of restitution.   Thus, we modify the judgment by vacating the amount of restitution awarded, and we remit the matter to Erie County Court for that purpose.

Finally, in view of defendant's criminal record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, CPL 470.15[6][b] ).

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings.

MEMORANDUM: