Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Carol S. HARP, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondents, New York State Department of Civil Service and New York State Department of Audit and Control, as Necessary Parties, Respondents.
Petitioner, a female correction officer, filed three complaints of sexual discrimination with respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) while working at Auburn Correctional Facility. Following a hearing pursuant to Executive Law article 15, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the New York State Department of Correctional Services (respondent) had discriminated against petitioner; that respondent retaliated against petitioner for filing the complaints; and that, as a result, petitioner suffered “significant” mental anguish and emotional distress. On respondent's administrative appeal to SDHR, the Commissioner adopted those findings but reduced the ALJ's award of compensatory damages from $15,000 to $1,500 and vacated the award of $2,732 for commuting expenses arising from petitioner's transfer to another facility. Petitioner seeks reinstatement of the ALJ's award of compensatory damages and commuting expenses.
In reviewing an award of damages for mental anguish in a discrimination case, “a court will intervene only when the award is not reasonably related to the wrongdoing, is not supported by substantial evidence or does not compare with awards for similar injuries” (Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 207 A.D.2d 585, 585-586, 615 N.Y.S.2d 531; see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 78 N.Y.2d 207, 219, 573 N.Y.S.2d 49, 577 N.E.2d 40; Matter of Diaz Chem. Corp. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 237 A.D.2d 932, 654 N.Y.S.2d 907 [decided herewith] ). In our view, the Commissioner's award of damages is not reasonably related to respondent's wrongdoing and does not compare with awards for similar injuries (see, e.g., Matter of Lutheran Soc. Servs. of Upper N.Y. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 142 A.D.2d 950, 530 N.Y.S.2d 376, affd. 74 N.Y.2d 824, 546 N.Y.S.2d 337, 545 N.E.2d 627; cf., Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Muia, 176 A.D.2d 1142, 575 N.Y.S.2d 957; Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v. McCall, 109 A.D.2d 953, 486 N.Y.S.2d 443). We therefore reinstate the ALJ's award of compensatory damages of $15,000.
We further conclude that, contrary to the Commissioner's finding, the discrimination was so severe and pervasive as to constitute a constructive termination of petitioner's employment (see, Matter of Imperial Diner v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 52 N.Y.2d 72, 436 N.Y.S.2d 231, 417 N.E.2d 525). Thus, we also reinstate the ALJ's award of commuting expenses of $2,732.
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 14, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)