Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael DIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Board of Education of Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District, and Michelle Kavanaugh, in her Capacity as Superintendent of Schools for Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District, Respondents-Respondents.
Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking, inter alia, to annul the determination terminating his employment. We agree with petitioner that respondents failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he intended to abandon his position as a tenured teacher (see Ciccarelli v. Board of Educ. of W. Seneca Cent. School Dist., 107 A.D.2d 1050, 486 N.Y.S.2d 578), and we thus further agree with petitioner that he was entitled to, but was not afforded, notice and a hearing before his employment was terminated (see Education Law §§ 3020, 3020-a). Contrary to the contention of respondents, the failure of petitioner to advise them of his reason for not returning to work did not constitute an abandonment of his position, inasmuch as that reason was known to respondents and was reasonable (see Matter of Rowland v. Oswego City School Dist., 97 Misc.2d 42, 45-46, 410 N.Y.S.2d 762). We therefore reverse the judgment, grant the petition in part, annul the determination and direct respondent Board of Education of Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District (Board) to reinstate petitioner to his position forthwith. In view of the fact that petitioner was absent because respondents assigned him to work at a location to which they knew he could not legally report, and because petitioner actively sought reinstatement at all times, we further direct the Board to reinstate petitioner with back pay and benefits retroactive to September 1, 2006 (see Matter of Winter v. Board of Educ. for Rhinebeck Cent. School Dist., 79 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 580 N.Y.S.2d 134, 588 N.E.2d 32, rearg. denied 79 N.Y.2d 978, 583 N.Y.S.2d 196, 592 N.E.2d 804; Matter of Kohler v. Board of Educ. of S. Huntington Union Free School Dist., 142 A.D.2d 676, 677-678, 530 N.Y.S.2d 844, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 603, 543 N.Y.S.2d 396, 541 N.E.2d 425).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the petition is granted in part, the determination is annulled and respondent Board of Education of Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District is directed to reinstate petitioner to his position as a tenured teacher forthwith with back pay and benefits retroactive to September 1, 2006.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 25, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)