Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WESTLAND GARDEN STATE PLAZA, L.P., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EZAT, INC., trading as VariZioni, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 20, 2004, awarding plaintiff the principal amount of $189,598.62, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 22, 2004, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the July 22, 2004 order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 4, 2005, denying defendant's motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument.
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, based on a New Jersey money judgment in its favor, was properly granted. That the out-of-state judgment was entered on default did not affect its adequacy as a ground for relief pursuant to CPLR 3213 (see CPLR 5406; Steinberg v. Metro Entertainment Corp., 145 A.D.2d 333, 534 N.Y.S.2d 995 [1988] ). Contrary to defendant's contention, it is apparent that the New Jersey court had personal jurisdiction over it. The affidavit of diligent inquiry submitted by plaintiff's counsel pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 4:4-5(c)(2) clearly demonstrated that sufficient efforts were made to serve defendant personally in New Jersey and that they were unsuccessful. The record further establishes that defendant was thereafter duly served by certified and regular mail at its principal place of business pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 4:4-4(b)(1)(C).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 31, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)