Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COMMITMENT OF Guardianship, etc. JOSHUA RAMON C., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Aleida C., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., et al., Petitioners-Respondents.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about June 24, 1997, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights over the subject child, and committed guardianship and custody of the child to petitioners for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing established with the requisite force that it was in the best interests of the subject child to be freed for adoption (see, Matter of Amanda R., 215 A.D.2d 220, 220-221, 626 N.Y.S.2d 481, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 705, 632 N.Y.S.2d 499, 656 N.E.2d 598). While respondent mother's recent efforts at drug rehabilitation are commendable, those efforts, viewed in the unfortunate context of a long history of drug abuse and attendant child neglect, afforded little more than a hope that respondent might one day be able to care for the child. Accordingly, we agree then with Family Court that it would not be in the child's best interests to hold stable familial arrangements for the child in abeyance pending the highly contingent resolution of respondent's situation and, accordingly, respondent's request for a suspended judgment was properly denied.
We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 09, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)