FARACE v. STATE (1999)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Peter FARACE, Limited Administrator of the Estate of John Farace, Deceased, Claimant-Respondent, v. STATE of New York, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: November 12, 1999

PRESENT: DENMAN, P.J., GREEN, PINE, SCUDDER and CALLAHAN, JJ.

Michael S. Buskus, Altamont, for defendant-appellant. Edward J. Carroll, Brooklyn, for claimant-respondent.

Claimant commenced this action as limited administrator of the estate of his brother (decedent), who died while an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility. Claimant offered expert proof that decedent died as a result of an asthma attack after correction officers refused to provide him with a refill of his asthma medication. Defendant offered expert proof that the death was caused by the combined effect of numerous drugs ingested by decedent.

We reject defendant's contention that the determination of liability is against the weight of the evidence. “On a bench trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Claridge Gardens v. Menotti, 160 A.D.2d 544, 544-545, 554 N.Y.S.2d 193; see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 591 N.Y.S.2d 978, 606 N.E.2d 1369, rearg. denied 81 N.Y.2d 835, 595 N.Y.S.2d 397, 611 N.E.2d 298). The Court of Claims, after considering the conflicting evidence adduced at trial, concluded that the death of decedent was caused by asthma and that defendant's negligence in failing to comply with the request of decedent for asthma medication contributed to his death. A fair interpretation of the evidence, which included the report of the coroner and her testimony adhering to the conclusions contained in that report, supports the court's conclusion. In addition, the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to sustain the judgment (see, Executive Park W. I v. Koock Elan Jung, 224 A.D.2d 990, 991, 637 N.Y.S.2d 832, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 803, 645 N.Y.S.2d 446, 668 N.E.2d 417), supports the court's determination attributing no liability to decedent.

We find, however, that the award of damages for conscious pain and suffering of $300,000 is excessive, and we modify that award by reducing it to $100,000.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and the facts and as modified affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network