Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ZELODIUS C., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DANNY L., Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.), entered on or about February 8, 2006, which granted petitioner mother visitation during all school vacations, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the matter remanded for a custody hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Liberally construing the allegations of the pro se petition, we find that they set forth sufficient facts which, if established at an evidentiary hearing, could afford a basis for the relief sought, viz., a change in custody (see Matter of Williams v. Mullineaux, 271 A.D.2d 869, 706 N.Y.S.2d 227 [2000] ). For example, the petition alleged that respondent father was preventing the parties' child from seeing petitioner (see e.g. Vernon v. Vernon, 296 A.D.2d 186, 192, 746 N.Y.S.2d 284 [2002], affd. 100 N.Y.2d 960, 768 N.Y.S.2d 719, 800 N.E.2d 1085 [2003]; Matter of Michael C., 282 A.D.2d 407, 723 N.Y.S.2d 670 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 722, 733 N.Y.S.2d 374, 759 N.E.2d 373 [2001] ). In addition, during the course of the proceedings, petitioner discovered that respondent had moved to Troy (three hours away) without advance notice, taking the child with him (see Matter of Hanson v. Hanson, 283 A.D.2d 677, 678, 724 N.Y.S.2d 118 [2001]; Matter of Markey v. Bederian, 274 A.D.2d 816, 817, 710 N.Y.S.2d 482 [2000] ).
We note finally that respondent has not appeared in opposition to this appeal (see Matter of Martin R.G. v. Ofelia G.O., 24 A.D.3d 305, 809 N.Y.S.2d 1 [2005]; Matter of Clifford M., 280 A.D.2d 366, 720 N.Y.S.2d 345 [2001] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 12, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)