Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ILENE M. and Others, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Evelyn V., Respondent-Appellant, Hector M., Respondent, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about July 16, 2002, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondent parents had physically abused and neglected the children, placed the children with petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The findings of abuse and derivative abuse were supported by the requisite preponderance of the evidence (Family Court Act § 1046[b] ). The court's evaluation of the evidence and the witnesses' credibility is clearly supported by the record and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Kathleen OO., 232 A.D.2d 784, 649 N.Y.S.2d 193 [1996] ). In less than a two-month period of time, both of respondent mother's nine-month-old twin boys suffered a fractured limb. The medical findings were that these injuries could not have been sustained except by reason of the acts or omissions by the person responsible for the children's care. Respondent mother failed to sustain her burden of offering a satisfactory explanation for the injuries (see Matter of Kevin R., 193 A.D.2d 351, 352, 596 N.Y.S.2d 813 [1993], appeal dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 735, 602 N.Y.S.2d 794, 622 N.E.2d 294 [1993] ).
The weight of credible evidence before the court at the dispositional hearing supported its determination that the children's best interests demanded they be placed with petitioner for up to 12 months (see Matter of F. Children, 271 A.D.2d 249, 707 N.Y.S.2d 32 [2000] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 02, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)