SIMMONS v. APPLE BANK FOR SAVINGS (1997)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

Princess SIMMONS, Respondent, v. APPLE BANK FOR SAVINGS, Appellant.

Decided: January 23, 1997

Before DiPAOLA, P.J., and STARK and INGRASSIA, JJ.

Timothy P. Brennan, New York City, for Appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

The denial of a motion to dismiss a small claims action does not constitute the denial of substantial justice within the meaning of UDCA 1807 since the only effect of same is to require the parties to proceed to trial (McBrearty v. Pryor & Mandelup, NYLJ, April 23, 1992, at 28, col. 1 [App.Term 9th & 10th Jud.Dists.]; Chaloupka v. Nassau Travel Center, Inc., NYLJ, Feb. 1, 1980, at 13, col. 5 [App.Term 9th & 10th Jud.Dists.] ). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

MEMORANDUM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network