MELNITZKY v. MELNITZKY (2005)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Elizabeth MELNITZKY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael MELNITZKY, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: October 11, 2005

TOM, J.P., MARLOW, ELLERIN, WILLIAMS, McGUIRE, JJ.

Michael Melnitzky, appellant pro se. Virginia A. LoPreto, New York, for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith Gische, J.), entered July 13, 2004, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion to enforce payment of defendant's child support arrears, and denied defendant's cross motion to inspect certain safe deposit boxes prior to the auction of their contents, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant does not claim that he made any of the child support payments in issue, but instead claims that property stored in certain safe deposit boxes, which he would have used to make the payments, was converted by plaintiff. The claim of conversion is vexatious and meritless (Melnitzky v. Apple Bank for Sav., 19 A.D.3d 252, 797 N.Y.S.2d 470 [2005] ). We have considered and rejected defendant's other arguments.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law