Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LA'ASIA LANAE S. and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Tamara Litisha S., Respondent-Appellant, The Salvation Army, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about October 24, 2002, which, upon fact-finding determinations of permanent neglect, terminated respondent-appellant's parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, which reasonably accommodated respondent's hearing impairment, respondent failed to successfully complete drug treatment, parenting skills and domestic violence programs within the statutorily relevant period, or secure suitable housing (see Matter of Jamie M., 63 N.Y.2d 388, 393, 482 N.Y.S.2d 461, 472 N.E.2d 311 [1984]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384-385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). Family Court correctly held that the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC 12101 et seq.) has no bearing on the proceeding (see Matter of Chance Jahmel B., 187 Misc.2d 626, 723 N.Y.S.2d 634 [2001] ). The finding that termination of parental rights is in the children's best interests is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent cannot presently ameliorate the conditions that led to the children's placement (see Matter of Michael B., 80 N.Y.2d 299, 311, 590 N.Y.S.2d 60, 604 N.E.2d 122 [1992]; Matter of Desmond Sinclair G., 202 A.D.2d 156, 158, 608 N.Y.S.2d 412 [1994] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 17, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)