Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Helmut AMANN, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. NEW YORK CITY LOFT BOARD, Respondent.
IN RE: Application of Helmut Amann, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. New York City Loft Board, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent New York City Loft Board dated November 14, 1997, which adopted the report and recommendation of the Director of Hearings, and denied Interim Multiple Dwelling status to the building located at 225 Lafayette Street, unanimously confirmed, the petitions brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by orders of the Supreme Court, New York County [Leland De Grasse, J., and Karla Moskowitz, J.], entered, respectively, on or about June 23, 1998 and on or about August 6, 1998), denied and the proceedings dismissed, without costs.
In reviewing administrative findings pursuant to the very limited authority conferred by CPLR article 78, this Court may not weigh the evidence, choose between conflicting proof, substitute its assessment of the evidence for that of the Administrative Law Judge, or interfere with the Administrative Law Judge's findings as to the credibility of witnesses (Matter of Deitch v. Dole, 159 A.D.2d 311, 552 N.Y.S.2d 590). The findings of the Loft Board herein, based on the findings of the Director of Hearings, that the residential use of the units occupied during the window period by Amann and Ibrahim was only an incident of the commercial use of those units, and the finding that the remaining units reviewed were not sufficiently converted to residential use (see, Anthony v. New York City Loft Board, 122 A.D.2d 725, 511 N.Y.S.2d 600; Franmar Infants Wear, Inc. v. Rios, 143 Misc.2d 562, 544 N.Y.S.2d 911), are supported by substantial evidence in the record. We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 24, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)