Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ruben CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered July 2, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The record fails to support defendant's current claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the entry of the guilty plea. Rather, the existing record reveals that there was no question of defendant's status as a second felony offender; that such status was considered in connection with the negotiated sentence; and that defendant acknowledged on several occasions that he had discussed with his counsel the terms of the plea agreement, including the promised sentence. Since the negotiated sentence was favorable, and was imposed as agreed, there is no basis for defendant's current claim that his counsel failed to provide meaningful representation in this regard (see, People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).
Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved because of his failure to move to either withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant's current plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, as evidenced by defendant's statements during the plea allocution acknowledging his guilt and his understanding of the terms of the plea agreement.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)