Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Neal BRINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), rendered January 11, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of reckless endangerment in the first degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 1/212 to 5 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the reckless endangerment conviction to reckless endangerment in the second degree and reducing the sentence on that conviction to a term of 1 year, and otherwise affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of reckless endangerment in the first degree was based on legally insufficient evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's actions of leading the police on a brief high-speed chase, half of which occurred on an empty street, and then, upon encountering heavy traffic, trying to force his way through the traffic at a slow rate of speed, while beeping his horn and flashing his high beams, failed to evince a depraved indifference to human life, as required for a conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree (see Penal Law § 120.25; People v. Feingold, 7 N.Y.3d 288, 819 N.Y.S.2d 691, 852 N.E.2d 1163 [2006]; People v. France, 57 A.D.2d 432, 394 N.Y.S.2d 891 [1977] ). However, we do find that the evidence establishes that defendant acted recklessly, and that his actions “create[d] a substantial risk of serious physical injury” to other drivers (Penal Law § 120.20).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 04, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)