Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Diedre WYNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GATES-CHILI CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Jennifer Johnson and Deborah Rose, personally and in their capacities as Teacher and Principal, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiff filed a certificate of dual residency with defendant Gates-Chili Central School District (School District) affirming that she and her children had moved into her father's residence located in the School District. Plaintiff then enrolled her children in the School District. After an investigation and a residency hearing, the School District determined that the children did not reside within the School District and advised plaintiff that her children could no longer attend school there. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for defendants' alleged violations of the “state's race discrimination and mental abuse statute.” Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record establishes that plaintiff failed to file a notice of claim pursuant to Education Law § 3813(1) and (2), and the filing of a notice of claim is a condition precedent to the commencement of this action (see Sangermano v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 290 A.D.2d 498, 736 N.Y.S.2d 258, lv. dismissed 99 N.Y.2d 531, 752 N.Y.S.2d 590, 782 N.E.2d 568; Doyle v. Board of Educ. of Deer Park Union Free School Dist., 230 A.D.2d 820, 646 N.Y.S.2d 842; see generally Mills v. County of Monroe, 59 N.Y.2d 307, 464 N.Y.S.2d 709, 451 N.E.2d 456, cert. denied 464 U.S. 1018, 104 S.Ct. 551, 78 L.Ed.2d 725; Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 282 A.D.2d 685, 723 N.Y.S.2d 410). In view of our determination, we do not address plaintiff's remaining contentions.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 16, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)