Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Antonio ANGELES, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Regina GOLDHIRSCH, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered October 23, 1998, which granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs demonstrated that defendants violated their non-delegable duty, pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1), to provide proper and adequate safety devices to afford proper protection to plaintiff employee, who was subject to elevation-related hazards (see, Correia v. Professional Data Mgt., Inc., 259 A.D.2d 60, 63, 693 N.Y.S.2d 596, 599). Plaintiff proved that the ladder slipped, collapsed or otherwise failed, and such proof is sufficient “to establish that the ladder did not provide proper protection” (see, Custer v. Cortland Hous. Auth., 266 A.D.2d 619, 621, 697 N.Y.S.2d 739). Defendants, in response, failed to raise a triable question since they offered no more than speculation as to how the accident might have happened (see, Kijak v. 330 Madison Ave. Corp., 251 A.D.2d 152, 153, 675 N.Y.S.2d 341), and the bare hope that they would be able to undermine plaintiff employee's credibility at trial on cross-examination (see, e.g., Billboard Sportswear v. Kapadia, 237 A.D.2d 135, 655 N.Y.S.2d 354). There is no evidence that plaintiff's own conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident (cf., Xirakis v. 1115 Fifth Ave. Corp., 226 A.D.2d 452, 453, 641 N.Y.S.2d 45; Tate v. Clancy-Cullen Storage Co., 171 A.D.2d 292, 296, 575 N.Y.S.2d 832), and, under Labor Law § 240(1), liability is absolute; contributory negligence is irrelevant (see, Public Adm'r of Bronx County v. Trump Village Constr. Corp., 177 A.D.2d 258, 259, 575 N.Y.S.2d 843). We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)