Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PARK HEALTH CENTER, as Assignee of Paul Gaywood, Appellant, v. UNITED FINANCIAL ADJUSTING COMPANY, Respondent.
Order unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted in the principal sum of $960.99, defendant's cross motion denied and matter remanded to the court below for a calculation of the statutory interest and attorney's fees.
Plaintiff's assignor was in an automobile accident on January 18, 1997. On August 3, 1999, plaintiff instituted this action under the no-fault law to recover for medical services it provided to the injured person. Plaintiff filed a proper certificate of doing business on March 19, 1998.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the ground that defendant had failed to pay or deny its claim within 30 days after receiving proof thereof, in violation of Insurance Law § 5106(a) and 11 NYCRR 65.15(g)(3). Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment.
In our view, the court should have granted plaintiff's motion. The failure of plaintiff to file a certificate of doing business until after the last date it treated its assignor is not a bar to recovery on its claim for services rendered (General Business Law § 130(1)[a]; see generally, Business Corporation Law § 1312) as such failure was cured prior to the commencement of the instant action (see e.g., Uribe v. Merchants Bank of N.Y., 266 A.D.2d 21, 697 N.Y.S.2d 279; William T. Schmitt Assoc. v. Loveless, 126 Misc.2d 480, 483 N.Y.S.2d 146).
In view of the foregoing, and in view of the fact that defendant did not deny the plaintiff's claim within 30 days after receiving proof thereof, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment should have been granted and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment denied (Insurance Law § 5106; 11 NYCRR 65.15 [g] [3]; Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 233 A.D.2d 433, 650 N.Y.S.2d 602). Accordingly, plaintiff is awarded summary judgment in the sum of $960.99, and the matter is remanded to the court below for a calculation of the statutory interest and attorney's fees (Insurance Law § 5106; 11 NYCRR 65.15[h][1]; 65.17[b][6][iii], [v]; see also, St. Clare's Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 215 A.D.2d 641, 628 N.Y.S.2d 128).
MEMORANDUM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 26, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)