Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joel A. YUNIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. FIRST USA BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.H.O.), entered November 15, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing plaintiff's claims for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the remaining claim for damages sustained in connection with mortgage application delays, and otherwise affirmed, with costs payable to defendant. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
The statements alleged to have been defamatory were business communications concerning plaintiffs' account, and while incomplete, did not rise to the level of defamation (see, Wilson v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 111 A.D.2d 807, 490 N.Y.S.2d 553, affd., 66 N.Y.2d 988, 499 N.Y.S.2d 395, 489 N.E.2d 1297). Plaintiffs presented no evidence that defendant was guilty of conduct so outrageous in character and so extreme as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious (Murphy v. American Home Prods. Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 293, 303, 461 N.Y.S.2d 232, 448 N.E.2d 86).
The remaining claim should also have been dismissed. This claim is unprovable given the prior unappealed order of preclusion entered against plaintiffs.
We have reviewed plaintiffs' other arguments and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 13, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)