STEINBARTH v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (1997)

Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion to vacate the default (see, CPLR 5015[a] ).   The court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the impairment of defendant's former attorney by alcoholism constituted a reasonable excuse for the default (see, Jiminez v. St. John's Riverside Hosp., 161 A.D.2d 497, 555 N.Y.S.2d 765), and defendant demonstrated that it has meritorious defenses to the action (see, Yacone v. Ryan Homes, 216 A.D.2d 963, 629 N.Y.S.2d 159).   Finally, defendant has remedied its default in complying with the court's discovery orders, and there is no indication that plaintiffs were unduly prejudiced by any delay (see, Yacone v. Ryan Homes, supra, at 963-964, 629 N.Y.S.2d 159).

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM: