Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eroildo DE JESUS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J., at Wade motion; Felice Shea, J., at Mapp/Huntley hearing, jury trial and sentencing), rendered October 21, 1994, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years to life and 2 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Since no reasonable view of the trial evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to defendant, would support a finding that the defendant was guilty of manslaughter in the second degree but not murder in the second degree, the trial court properly denied defendant's request for submission of the former crime as a lesser included offense (People v. Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427, 452 N.Y.S.2d 389, 437 N.E.2d 1146). The trial evidence unequivocally established that defendant acted with the intent to cause the death of the victim by stabbing him in the neck.
Defendant's claim that the court erred in summarily denying his motion for a Wade hearing is unpreserved, and in any event, without merit. Defendant never disputed the People's assertion, set forth in opposition to defendant's omnibus motion, that defendant was sufficiently known to the identifying witnesses so as to render their show-up identification of him merely confirmatory (People v. Estrada, 241 A.D.2d 378, 661 N.Y.S.2d 5). Moreover, when identities of the witnesses were disclosed during the subsequent Mapp/Huntley hearings, defendant never sought to renew the Wade motion (see, CPL 710.40[4] ).
We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)