Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rupert SHERWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J., at hearing; Nicholas Figueroa, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered March 20, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 5 1/4 to 10 1/2 years and 6 months, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. There was ample evidence establishing probable cause for defendant's arrest, including an exchange of money for unseen objects taken out of a plastic bag, recognized by the experienced observing officer to be a drug transaction (see, People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835, 660 N.Y.S.2d 549, 683 N.E.2d 14), and the fact that, prior to arresting defendant, the police learned that drugs had been recovered from defendant's purchaser shortly after the transaction with defendant took place.
By failing to request further relief after appropriate curative action by the court, defendant has not preserved his current claim that the People's summation denied him a fair trial, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the challenged portions of the People's summation do not warrant reversal (see, People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, 591 N.Y.S.2d 1001, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 884, 597 N.Y.S.2d 945, 613 N.E.2d 977). Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved and without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 25, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)