Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COMMITMENT OF the CUSTODY AND GUARDIANSHIP OF GABRIELLE S., etc., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen, etc., Ingrid S., Respondent-Appellant, St. Christopher-Ottilie, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 11, 1995, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of mental illness, and committing their custody to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of vacating the termination of respondent's parental rights with respect to Vernon S., and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The finding of mental illness within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b(4)(c) is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including unchallenged and unequivocal expert testimony of respondent's recurring cycle of psychiatric hospitalizations and drug abuse, her marginal functional existence throughout her adult life, a poor prognosis (see, Matter of Christine Marie R., 236 A.D.2d 308, 654 N.Y.S.2d 134; Matter of Luisa Lara M., 236 A.D.2d 267, 654 N.Y.S.2d 8), and the special needs of the children. However, in view of respondent's and the older child's desire for continued contact and the Law Guardian's opposition to the termination of parental rights with regard to that child, among other factors, it has not been shown that termination of the respondent natural mother's parental rights is in this child's best interests. The older child should remain in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 04, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)