Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BROOKMAN & BROOKMAN, P.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. George SCHIAVONI, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered March 13, 1997, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and directed an assessment of damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
In this action to enforce defendants' guarantee to pay legal fees owed by their son and his wholly owned corporation, the IAS court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment based on submission of the written guarantee and evidence that due demand was made and payment not forthcoming (see, Gateway State Bank v. Shangri-La Private Club for Women, 113 A.D.2d 791, 493 N.Y.S.2d 226, affd. 67 N.Y.2d 627, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 490 N.E.2d 546). Defendants did not submit opposing affidavits and the affirmation of counsel lacking personal knowledge was insufficient to defeat the motion (see, Dempsey v. Intercontinental Hotel Corp., 126 A.D.2d 477, 479, 511 N.Y.S.2d 10). The handwritten letter from the guarantors that the money had been deposited in their son's account and that payments were made on the guarantee from said account is sufficient to overcome the claim of the client that the guarantee was made without his personal knowledge.
Defendants' other arguments were not raised before the motion court and may not be raised for the first time on appeal (see, Recovery Consultants v. Shih-Hsieh, 141 A.D.2d 272, 276, 534 N.Y.S.2d 374) and, in any event, are without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 11, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)