Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher WILDER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered November 26, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and bail jumping in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 5 to 10 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant was properly convicted of bail jumping in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.57). Defendant was originally released, prior to indictment. Upon his release, he was given an adjourned date and told to return. In the interim, an indictment was filed. When defendant failed to appear on the adjourned date, the court stayed a warrant and sent a letter advising defendant of the pending indictment and the next court date for his appearance. He failed to appear on that date and a warrant for his arrest was issued. He was indicted for bail jumping in the first degree based on this latter failure to appear. We conclude that Penal Law § 215.57 encompasses the circumstances here, notwithstanding that no indictment was yet pending at the time of the defendant's original release.
The court properly admitted “negative identification testimony” (see, People v. Bolden, 58 N.Y.2d 741, 459 N.Y.S.2d 22, 445 N.E.2d 198) concerning the undercover officer's exoneration of a suspect whose attire was markedly similar to that of defendant. This testimony was relevant to the identification issues developed at trial (see, People v. Rodriguez, 193 A.D.2d 633, 597 N.Y.S.2d 449, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 1079, 601 N.Y.S.2d 599, 619 N.E.2d 677; People v. Marrero, 156 A.D.2d 141, 548 N.Y.S.2d 188, lv. denied 75 N.Y.2d 921, 555 N.Y.S.2d 40, 554 N.E.2d 77).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 23, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)