Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MIGUEL ANGEL C. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Belinda G., also known as Belinda C., Respondent-Appellant, Catholic Home Bureau, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2005, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children and committed their guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner satisfied its statutory burden of making diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][f] ). Although respondent complied with some of the agency's service plan, she nonetheless permanently neglected her children by failing to plan for their future, since she did not complete an anger management program during the statutorily relevant period, or appropriately address the issue of her anger, which had led to the children's removal from her home more than five years earlier (see Matter of Daniella C.G., 25 A.D.3d 494, 808 N.Y.S.2d 213 [2006]; Matter of La'Asia Lanae S., 23 A.D.3d 271, 803 N.Y.S.2d 568 [2005] ).
The preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing established that the best interests of the children would be served by freeing them for adoption and terminating the respondent mother's parental rights (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-48, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). Accordingly, the court properly declined to enter a suspended judgment (see Matter of Terry P., 18 A.D.3d 348, 795 N.Y.S.2d 551 [2005]; Matter of Pearl M.A., 13 A.D.3d 141, 786 N.Y.S.2d 470 [2004] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 08, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)