Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RIDGE ROAD FIRE DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Michael P. SCHIANO, as Hearing Officer Designated Pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement Between Ridge Road Fire District and Ridge Road Professional Firefighters Association IAFF, Local 3794, International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Kevin Nowack and Ridge Road Professional Firefighters Association IAFF, Local 3794, International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO, Respondents.
Respondent Kevin Nowack, a firefighter employed by petitioner, sought benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a(1) for injuries that he allegedly sustained during the course of his employment. Petitioner denied Nowack's application on the ground that Nowack's injury was the result of a preexisting condition. Nowack appealed petitioner's determination pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between petitioner and respondent union, which provided for the appointment of a hearing officer and an evidentiary review of Nowack's application for benefits. Michael P. Schiano (respondent), the Hearing Officer, determined that the denial of Nowack's application was not supported by substantial evidence, and petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination.
Supreme Court transferred the proceeding to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g) on the ground that the petition raises a substantial evidence issue. That was error. Respondent's determination was not “made as a result of a hearing held, and at which evidence was taken, pursuant to direction by law” (CPLR 7803[4] ). Rather, the determination was the result of a hearing conducted pursuant to the terms of the collective bargaining agreement. Thus, the proceeding should not have been transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g) (see Matter of Pierino v. Brown, 281 A.D.2d 960, 722 N.Y.S.2d 845). We therefore vacate the order transferring the proceeding and remit the matter to Supreme Court for disposition on the merits (see Matter of Butler v. Town of Throop, 303 A.D.2d 976, 756 N.Y.S.2d 678; Matter of Pierino v. Brown, 281 A.D.2d 960, 722 N.Y.S.2d 845; see also Matter of Redanz v. City of Buffalo, 4 A.D.3d 868, 869, 772 N.Y.S.2d 138).
It is hereby ORDERED that said order be and the same hereby is unanimously vacated without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 08, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)