Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CUSTODY AND GUARDIANSHIP OF JOE ALEX F., et al., Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Anna R., Respondent–Appellant, Jewish Child Care Association, Petitioner–Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered February 15, 1995, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of permanent neglect, and committing their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence of life-threatening injuries, including bilateral fractured ribs, sustained by the younger subject child when he was three and a half months old, which resulted in the placement of the child and his 22–month–old brother in foster care; respondent's failure to give any medically tenable explanation for these injuries, or for the fractured leg sustained to a third child born while the other two were in foster care and she was residing in another State; and respondent's failure otherwise to cooperate with the agency's efforts by completing a course of psychotherapy addressed to the abuse problem and by separating from her violent paramour, the father of the children (Social Services Law § 384–b[7][c]; see, Matter of S. Children, 210 A.D.2d 175, 620 N.Y.S.2d 369, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 807, 628 N.Y.S.2d 50, 651 N.E.2d 918). Termination of respondent's parental right is in the best interests of the children.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 08, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)