Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Robert BARRY, An Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on June 27, 1985, and maintains an office in Utica. The Grievance Committee filed a petition alleging that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to maintain funds of a client in a special separate account. Respondent filed an answer admitting the allegations of the petition and submitted matters in mitigation.
We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:
DR 1-102(A)(4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3[a][4] )-engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;
DR 1-102(A)(8) (22 NYCRR 1200.3[a][8] )-engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law;
DR 6-101(A)(3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30[a][3] )-neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him;
DR 9-102(B)(1) (22 NYCRR 1200.46[b][1] )-failing to maintain funds of a client in a special account separate from his business or personal accounts; and
DR 9-102(E) (22 NYCRR 1200.46[e] )-making withdrawals from a special account payable to cash rather than to a named payee.
In mitigation, we note that, during the period of time in which the misconduct occurred, respondent was suffering from severe emotional problems and was abusing alcohol. Respondent has sought counseling to alleviate his problems. We note that no client has suffered any financial loss as a result of respondent's misconduct. Under these circumstances, respondent should be censured. We direct that respondent continue in counseling for his emotional problems and agree to be monitored and remain subject to the program of the New York State Bar Association Committee on Lawyer Alcoholism and Drug Abuse for a period of three years.
Order of censure entered.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 13, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)