Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KENNETH DAYSHAWN J. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sylvia L., Respondent-Appellant, New York Foundling Hospital, et al., Petitioners-Respondents.
Final orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant mother permanently neglected her three children, terminated her parental rights and placed the children in the custody of petitioners for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to the mother's argument, Foundling Hospital made diligent efforts to reunify her with the children, upon her release from prison and over the course of a year of multiple referrals to counseling and therapy, multiple service plan reviews, arrangements for potential visitation, and communications with service providers who assisted her. Foundling Hospital made it clear to the mother that the greatest impediment to the return of her children was her ongoing unwillingness to regularly participate in therapy. This therapy was critical because the children had suffered severe harm while under her care, and because she never acknowledged responsibility for the scalding event or her need for counseling. The mother's irregular attendance at service plan reviews and other agency appointments, as well as her resistance to court-ordered therapy, supplied clear and convincing evidence of failure by an uncooperative parent to plan for the children's future (Social Services Law § 384-b[7] ), and warranted the permanent neglect finding (see Matter of Adrian M., 270 A.D.2d 93, 704 N.Y.S.2d 247 [2000], lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 757, 713 N.Y.S.2d 1, 734 N.E.2d 1212 [2000] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 08, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)