Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sydney DIXON, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John S. Moore, J.), rendered October 24, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the first degree (two counts), rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree (two counts), arson in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 175 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting photographs depicting the appearance of the kidnapping victim after her escape, since they were not inflammatory and were highly probative of her status as a victim, particularly since a defense theory at trial was that the kidnapping victim was a participant in the murder (see People v. Wood, 79 N.Y.2d 958, 960, 582 N.Y.S.2d 992, 591 N.E.2d 1178 [1992]; People v. Gumbs, 304 A.D.2d 365, 756 N.Y.S.2d 846 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 582, 764 N.Y.S.2d 392, 796 N.E.2d 484 [2003] ). Defendant's claims relating to photographs of the murder victim, as well as his challenges to the People's summation, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal.
We conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998]; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 08, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)