Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: PIERY VINETTE D., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Virtudes Mignon D., Respondent-Appellant, Episcopal Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about March 3, 2003, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent frustrated the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship by, inter alia, failing to maintain contact with the agency for seven months after the child had been returned to her on a trial basis, and then, after the child was returned to the foster mother, failing to visit the child for four months (Social Services Law § 384-b [7][a]; see Matter of Amanda R., 215 A.D.2d 220, 626 N.Y.S.2d 481 [1995], lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 705, 632 N.Y.S.2d 499, 656 N.E.2d 598 [1995]; Matter of Denaysia Shantel C., 266 A.D.2d 109, 698 N.Y.S.2d 664 [1999] ). A preponderance of the evidence shows that termination of respondent's parental rights is in the child's best interests. Respondent's recent improvements in maintaining contact with the child and utilizing rehabilitative services that were part of the agency's plan for the child's future came too late to warrant a suspended judgment (see Matter of Arron Brandend C., 267 A.D.2d 107, 108, 701 N.Y.S.2d 6 [1999] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 08, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)