Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ANGEL SHANTE G. and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Tasha G., et al., Respondents-Appellants, New York Foundling Hospital, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Maureen McLeod, J.), entered on or about April 17, 2003, which, upon fact-finding determinations of permanent neglect, terminated respondents' parental rights respecting the subject children and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to the hearing-impaired respondent parents' argument, petitioner agency made diligent efforts to reunify them with their children by making referrals for needed services, scheduling visitation, holding agency meetings and plan reviews and attempting to work with agencies that provided services for the deaf. The agency's efforts, although consistent and comprehensive, were unavailing given respondents' lack of cooperation. Respondents failed to comply with agency goals: they did not complete parenting skills training, obtain suitable housing or attend counseling. Nor did they regularly attend scheduled visitation (see e.g. Matter of Byron Christopher Malik J., 309 A.D.2d 669, 765 N.Y.S.2d 874 [2003] ). Accordingly, the court properly determined that they permanently neglected the children by failing to plan for their future.
The evidence at the dispositional hearing was preponderant that termination of respondents' parental rights was in the children's best interests (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). The mother's request for a suspended judgment was properly denied absent evidence that she had a realistic and feasible plan to provide an adequate and stable home for her children (see Matter of Charlene Lashay J., 280 A.D.2d 320, 720 N.Y.S.2d 469 [2001] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 05, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)