Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application for Guardianship, etc., CHARLENE LASHAY J., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of 18 Years, etc., Beatrice J., etc., Respondent–Appellant, Commissioner of Social Services, et al., Petitioners–Respondents.
Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about March 18, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights and transferred care and custody of the subject children to petitioners Children's Aid Society and the Commissioner of Social Services, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record amply demonstrates that petitioner agency made diligent and repeated efforts to fulfill its obligation to assist respondent in overcoming the obstacles to the children's return. However, while respondent complied with the recommended rehabilitative programs and took advantage of the agency's offered services, the problems that precipitated the children's removal were still present at the time of the neglect hearing. Although the agency appropriately determined that eliminating the risk of renewed domestic violence and sexual abuse in respondent mother's home was of paramount importance in planning for the children's return (see, Matter of Michael M., 172 A.D.2d 152, 567 N.Y.S.2d 693), respondent failed to separate herself from her abusive husband or otherwise effectively address these problems. This failure to plan for the return of the children constituted grounds for the court's finding of permanent neglect (see, Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 N.Y.2d 838, 501 N.Y.S.2d 647, 492 N.E.2d 775; Matter of Christopher II., 222 A.D.2d 900, 635 N.Y.S.2d 747, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 812, 644 N.Y.S.2d 145, 666 N.E.2d 1059).
A suspended judgment, based on respondent's cooperation with the agency and efforts at self-improvement, was unwarranted since there was no evidence that respondent had a realistic and feasible plan to provide an adequate and stable home for the children (see, Matter of Latasha W., 268 A.D.2d 340, 701 N.Y.S.2d 418).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 08, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)