Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of the Arbitration between NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant, Joan M. MOORE, Respondent-Respondent.
Supreme Court erred in denying the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of a claim for supplemental uninsured motorist (SUM) benefits. Respondent was injured in an automobile accident on September 23, 1995. The insurance policy issued to her by petitioner required her to give notice of the SUM claim “[a]s soon as practicable”, i.e., “with reasonable promptness after [she] knew or should reasonably have known that the tortfeasor was underinsured” (Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mancuso, 93 N.Y.2d 487, 495, 693 N.Y.S.2d 81, 715 N.E.2d 107). Respondent gave notice of the claim for SUM benefits on March 16, 1999; the notice was denied by petitioner two weeks later on the ground of late notice. We conclude that the 42-month delay was unreasonable (see, Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], 249 A.D.2d 924, 925, 672 N.Y.S.2d 219), and respondent failed to meet her burden of establishing a reasonable excuse for the delay (cf., Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], supra, at 925-926, 672 N.Y.S.2d 219). The nature and extent of respondent's injury did not change from the time of the accident until the time when respondent provided petitioner with notice of the SUM claim (cf., Matter of Travelers Ins. Co. [DeLosh], supra, at 925-926, 672 N.Y.S.2d 219), nor did she demonstrate that she acted with due diligence in attempting to determine the insurance status of the tortfeasor (see, Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wexler, 276 A.D.2d 490, 713 N.Y.S.2d 878; Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Montopoli, 262 A.D.2d 647, 692 N.Y.S.2d 459). Respondent was aware of the identity of the tortfeasor on the day of the accident and was represented by counsel during most of the 42-month delay but provided no explanation for her failure to ascertain the tortfeasor's liability limits during that period of time (see, Ciaramella v. State Farm Ins. Co., 273 A.D.2d 831, 709 N.Y.S.2d 296; Owen v. Allstate Ins. Co., 250 A.D.2d 1018, 1019-1020, 673 N.Y.S.2d 477). We therefore reverse the order and grant the petition seeking a permanent stay of arbitration.
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 07, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)