LUCORE v. LUCORE (2001)

 Family Court properly awarded custody of two of respondent's children to petitioner, the children's grandmother.   Petitioner met her burden of establishing the existence of extraordinary circumstances based on respondent's voluntary relinquishment of the children to petitioner's care from 1988 until 1996, together with the unstable lifestyle of respondent, the violent and abusive environments created by paramours of respondent, and the attachment of the children to petitioner (see, Matter of Michael G.B. v. Angela L. B., 219 A.D.2d 289, 292-293, 642 N.Y.S.2d 452).   Thus, the court properly considered the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277;  see also, Matter of Pamela S.S. v. Charles E., 280 A.D.2d 999, 720 N.Y.S.2d 669 [decided herewith] ), and the record supports the court's determination that the best interests of the children are served by the award of custody to petitioner (see, Matter of Paul C. v. Tracy C., 209 A.D.2d 955, 956, 622 N.Y.S.2d 159).   We have considered respondent's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM: