Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jimmy RIOS, Appellant.
Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.
Inasmuch as the defendant in the case at bar was charged with at least one traffic infraction subjecting him to the possibility of imprisonment if convicted (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180[h][2] ), the lower court was required to advise him prior to trial of his right to counsel (see People v. Weinstock, 80 Misc.2d 510, 363 N.Y.S.2d 878 [App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists. 1974] ) as well as his right, inter alia, to an adjournment to obtain counsel (CPL 170.10[3], [4]; People v. Rabadi, N.Y.L.J., Oct. 8, 1996 [App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists.]; People v. Johnson, N.Y.L.J., July 15, 1996 [App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists.]; People v. Ashrat, N.Y.L.J., Feb. 26, 1996 [App. Term, 2d & 11th Jud. Dists.] ). The uniform traffic tickets issued to defendant in the case at bar did not contain a statement advising defendant of the aforementioned rights (see CPL 170.10[5] ). The People contend that defendant was advised of these rights by letter dated September 26, 2002 which stated in pertinent part: “[i]f you plan to be represented by an attorney he or she should accompany you and be ready for trial as scheduled. Requests for an adjournment should be written and sent to the Judge for consideration.” Regardless of whether this letter was sufficient to advise defendant of his right to counsel and right to an adjournment to obtain counsel, inasmuch as the defendant appeared without counsel, the court was required to inform defendant of said rights and “that he may exercise such rights at any stage of the action” (CPL 170.10[6] ). Furthermore, “the court must not only accord him opportunity to exercise such rights but must itself take such affirmative action as is necessary to effectuate them ․” (CPL 170.10[4][a] ). In light of the foregoing, the judgments of conviction are reversed and the matter is remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.
We pass on no other issues.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 24, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)