Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of VILLAGE OF PENN YAN, Respondent, v. Janice O. TRAVIS, et al., Respondents, County of Yates Civil Service Commission, Appellant.
Supreme Court properly annulled the determination of respondent County of Yates Civil Service Commission (Commission) that the former position of Utilities Operations Supervisor and the new position of Assistant Director of Public Works are comparable and that the appointment of an employee to the new position must be made from the eligible list for the former position. The principal duty of the former Utilities Operations Supervisor was to supervise employees of the Utilities Division of the Village of Penn Yan Municipal Utilities Board. The final job description for the position of Assistant Director of Public Works submitted by petitioner to the Commission in December 1996 expressly excluded supervisory duties. Additionally, the job descriptions for the two positions require significantly different minimum educational and experience qualifications, the Assistant Director is required to perform tasks not performed by the former Utilities Operations Supervisor, and the essential nature of those tasks is clerical and administrative but not supervisory (see, Matter of Rayner v. Sinnot, 241 A.D.2d 601, 659 N.Y.S.2d 346; Matter of Zimmerman v. Burstein, 117 A.D.2d 328, 502 N.Y.S.2d 556). The minutes of the January 15, 1997 meeting of the Commission establish that its decision was based upon a review of an earlier proposed job description that had since been revised to eliminate supervisory responsibilities, not the most recent job description that had been submitted to it. Thus, the determination of the Commission was arbitrary and without a rational basis and was properly annulled (see, Matter of Butler v. Walter, 210 A.D.2d 941, 620 N.Y.S.2d 673).
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 13, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)