Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Donald TUCKER, a suspended attorney. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Donald Tucker, Respondent.
Respondent Donald Tucker was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 26, 1963. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Judicial Department.
By order entered July 1, 1997 (231 A.D.2d 198, 659 N.Y.S.2d 434), this Court suspended respondent from practice, effective immediately and until further order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(e)(1)(i) due to respondent's willful failure to cooperate with an investigation of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(g), the Committee's notice of motion to suspend respondent advised him that an attorney who has been suspended and has not appeared or applied in writing for a hearing or reinstatement within six months of the date of the order of suspension may be disbarred without further notice. In excess of six months have lapsed since the date of the order of suspension. Respondent, who also has not appeared on the present motion, has failed to appear or apply in writing for a hearing or for reinstatement.
In view of the foregoing, the Committee's motion to disbar respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4(g), dated February 6, 1998, is granted (Matter of Gutstein, 219 A.D.2d 330, 641 N.Y.S.2d 540; Matter of Reilly, 219 A.D.2d 96, 640 N.Y.S.2d 33) and respondent's name is stricken from the roll of attorneys, effective immediately.
Motion granted, and respondent disbarred from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 07, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)