Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwardo PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J. at hearing; Lawrence Tonetti, J. at nonjury trial and sentence), rendered April 7, 1999, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The hearing record establishes that on each occasion that defendant made statements prior to the administration of Miranda warnings, a reasonable person in defendant's situation would have considered himself free to leave (see, People v. Yukl, 25 N.Y.2d 585, 589, 307 N.Y.S.2d 857, 256 N.E.2d 172, cert. denied 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 78, 27 L.Ed.2d 89; see also, Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495-496, 97 S.Ct. 711, 50 L.Ed.2d 714). After the police found defendant with a seriously injured child, defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the hospital. The police did not restrict defendant's liberty during the time spent driving to the hospital and waiting there for the child to be treated, and defendant's statements during these time periods were clearly spontaneous in any event. A detective subsequently informed defendant that the child had died, and defendant agreed to come to the police station and cooperate with the investigation. At the station house defendant was not restrained in any manner, and after brief, investigatory questioning, he gave an account of the child's injuries that led the detective to deliver Miranda warnings, after which defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights and made further statements.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 26, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)