Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Charles A. GRUTMAN (admitted as Charles Allen Grutman), an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Charles A. Grutman, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent Charles A. Grutman was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department, as Charles Allen Grutman, on June 19, 1968. At all times relevant to this petition, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department, seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b).
Respondent pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 11, 2001, to one count of stealing government monies in violation of 18 USC § 641, specifically $39,742 in Social Security benefit payments that had been deposited directly into his father's checking account in the three years following his father's death. Respondent was a signatory on his father's account. At the plea hearing, respondent also admitted stealing $1,300 of Veterans Administration benefits that had been paid into his late father's account. Sentencing was scheduled for March 1, 2002.
The crime of which respondent was convicted is a felony under Federal law and is an offense that, if committed within this State, would be a class D felony (Judiciary Law § 90[4][e]; Penal Law 155.35 [grand larceny in the third degree] ).
As a result of his felony conviction, respondent has been automatically disbarred (Judiciary Law § 90[4][a] ).
Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law (Judiciary Law § 90[4] [b] ).
Respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York nunc pro tunc to December 11, 2001.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 07, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)