Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kingsley WALKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Whitney G. BENOIT, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered April 2, 1998, which denied plaintiff's motion for default judgment and inquest, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion for default is granted, and the matter is remitted for inquest on the question of damages.
In this action by a passenger against the driver of a tour bus involved in an accident in New Jersey, the process server submitted an affidavit attesting to service of the summons and complaint by affixing and mailing at defendant's residence after duly diligent efforts at personal service (CPLR 308[4] ). A year later, in response to plaintiff's motion for default judgment, defendant countered that he was never personally served. But this denial was offered only in the form of an affirmation by his attorney and an affidavit from his employer's insurer, neither of whom had personal knowledge as to whether or not he had been personally served. Essentially, their argument was that defendant routinely forwarded all such papers to his employer and the latter's insurer, and that no such transfer of paperwork had taken place in this instance.
In order to rebut an affidavit of service and test the process at a traverse hearing, a defendant must personally contest the service on motion (see, National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Montgomery, 245 A.D.2d 150, 665 N.Y.S.2d 665). The absence of such personal attestation further highlights defendant's failure to offer a meritorious defense and an excuse for not serving a timely answer (Keita v. Ortega, 240 A.D.2d 156, 658 N.Y.S.2d 859). Default judgment is warranted.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 26, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)