Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JASON B., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about January 30, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the third degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, jostling, and menacing in the third degree, and that appellant had committed a designated felony act, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 3 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the finding that appellant committed a designated felony act and remanding for a new dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding as to attempted robbery was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Taking the entire sequence of events as a whole, we find ample evidence of a forcible attempt to take property.
The court's finding that appellant committed a “designated felony act” on the basis of multiple recidivism (Family Ct Act § 301.2[8][vi] ) was error since he had only one prior finding that he had committed two prior felonies, rather than two prior findings that he had committed a prior felony, as is required by the statute. We do not read the statute as permitting separate counts of the same petition, involving the same incident, to qualify as the necessary predicate for enhancement (see, Matter of Manuel R., 89 N.Y.2d 1043, 659 N.Y.S.2d 825, 681 N.E.2d 1271; Matter of Nicholas G., 177 Misc.2d 113, 675 N.Y.S.2d 788).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 09, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)