Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Albania DeLEON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GLOVEBOX REALTY CORP., Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered July 15, 1998, which, in an action by plaintiff tenant against defendant building owner for personal injuries sustained as a result of inadequate building security, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff's submission of an affidavit from an individual stating that he and the perpetrator entered the building through the front door, which had a broken lock, that they then went to the roof where the perpetrator picked up the heavy, flat stone that had been propping open the roof door and threw it over the roof to the ground below, and that they ran away when they realized the stone had hit someone, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the perpetrator gained access to the building and its roof as a result of inadequate security (cf., Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 N.Y.2d 544, 551-552, 684 N.Y.S.2d 139, 706 N.E.2d 1163). Defendant's contention that the perpetrator could have gained access to the roof from adjoining rooftops regardless of any security measures defendant employed, viewed against plaintiff's evidence that the building superintendent was aware of a history of criminal activity on the roof, including the throwing of garbage and glass bottles to the ground below, serves only to raise issues of fact going both to proximate cause (see, id., at 549-551, 684 N.Y.S.2d 139, 706 N.E.2d 1163) and the extent of defendant's duty to provide reasonable security (see, Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 507, 520, n. 8, 429 N.Y.S.2d 606, 407 N.E.2d 451).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)