Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of the COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, etc., The Laura Spellman Rockefeller Memorial Trust, etc. The Salvation Army, Intervenor-Petitioner-Appellant, v. New York Community Trust, etc. Respondents-Respondents, Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. et al., Respondents.
Order, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about June 5, 1998, which granted the motion of respondent New York Community Trust for summary judgment dismissing as time-barred the claim by intervenor-petitioner Salvation Army for wrongful repudiation of it as a beneficiary of the subject trust, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It is clear from documentary evidence in the record that intervenor-petitioner Salvation Army had ample notice that the Distribution Committee of respondent New York Community Trust had invoked its discretionary variance power to terminate automatic distributions to petitioner previously made from a certain trust under its administration and that such notice was received on or about the time that the decision was made. It is evident as well that petitioner for some 25 years subsequent to its receipt of the aforementioned notice failed to litigate respondent's termination of the automatic distributions. Petitioner's present challenge to the termination of those distributions, brought considerably more than six years from its repudiation as a beneficiary, is, accordingly, time-barred (see, CPLR 213; Matter of Barabash, 31 N.Y.2d 76, 334 N.Y.S.2d 890, 286 N.E.2d 268) and was correctly dismissed by the Surrogate.
We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them unpersuasive.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 04, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)